F'n P[!]

an-archy? / tan gent
[!] sarcasm irony punk.
Lede or Ship:  Heading

4 M or links in order of insert
(In F able. / punc. / -archy / gent)

War'n Buffet Rule
The P ?
Original Intent: almost lost, Footnotes Page # ?
Gephardt*  -House Republicans Changed the Rules to Keep Government Closed
McConnell  -Who Controls the House GOP?
Battle. -  George W. Bush and the Real Story of the Great Recession****  - (b.s.) Buffet + Warren
Re  - Buffet +Metaphor
:  - Rule + Field
congre$$ - [War'n Pic/MoveOn]
AM:
Pelosi/
Klobuchar
Gang **

** links/line anachronistic
AM=Andrea Mithell
*** Deep Files Go 4 it.

(buy Jim'n Knee: Faith 'n Progress ?)
[The Cycle? New Hostage on the Table. /  Measured Optimism ? ]
[If you don't vote, you won't get your pudding.  How can you get your pudding when you won't eat your meet?]

Two Points

Please note that just because someone endorses the priciples of a movement, that does not mean they endorse any of their tactics. Obama has been accused of distancing himself from OWS, and the 99%, but I think that is only in terms of some of their behavior and some of their demands.

Who am I to suggest what might work for Occupy Wall Street, but it could be strategic to give them the park back and MoveOn[*] (pardon the Irony)! While I have associated with MoveOn, DFA, and a # of other acronyms and parties(individual and organizational) I think that their message can evolve and be more dimensional.

[Belated Jack Sparrow]

[* 11-4-11 link description added: Ron Suskind on The Rachel Maddow Show, discusses the Financial Transaction Tax And on a related issue, replacing Tim Geitner. The man, any man is not the issue. The policy is the issue. But replacing any individual in the face of Republican obstructionism is problematic.]

[11-4-11 My comment on Left Business Observer is "awaiting moderation". Maybe it is actually awaiting radicalization, but I realize the practical difficulities of moving from Zuccotti Park.(Packing up, needing a place to go, but with the opportunity to return, unless the police occupy Zuccotti Park.) I just mean to take success from the fact that there are so many "Occupy Places" around the country and around the world, not to diminish the value of general assemblies, and the logistical need for occupying some space. Meanwhile here are some other perspectives:
Marc Ash Anarchy v. Non-Violence, The Movement Is Tested
Michael Moore on "Occupy Oakland"
Bill Moyers America Occupies Wall Street Because Wall Street Occupies America
Noam Chomsky Occupy the World
Robert Reich The Occupiers' Responsive Chord

[More Maddow, Cain and Perry and more.]

[A gestalt? Jon Stewart asks about OWS, North Dakota and Syria.
Walk like an...Obama?(up/date plank**)]

** See **B here with follow up.
[And Buffet sages. Note that this is likely the root of Obamanomics(Robert Reich) as I found it, and the root of our problems as Obama and Buffet found it.
More followup. [See deter/mined and Sat Ire.(Buffet v. Trump)]
[Three Points: A. B. C.]

Commander-in-Chief Obama

[UPDATE 3-24-09: President Barack Obama on the Federal Budget: Four Principles ]
[Speaking of Battles: The real authoritarian v. populist.
The Battle Over the A.I.G. Bonuses: Class War in the Media ]

I never really did follow up on viewing or reading the bottom link at my Off The Cliff post, but used it as an allegorical leap. But here is a good point someone found regarding the Buffet comment.
From which I snip the point:

"What is required is a commander in chief that's looked at like a commander in chief in a time of war," Buffett said.

Commander-in-Chief? Where have we heard that before?
My point was the economics of the War on Terror where I said:

The honesty of the new budget and accounting now includes the war on terror which was not on the books. So rather than declare, a win or lose the economy bifurcation, the new accounting must include the soft power ingredients which do not come free. I have not seen where this is said, but it should and probably has been or will be.

Now the bottom line is what is pre-emptive.And should be a uniter not a divider.

* and since what confused me about the Buffet report was his call for clarity, I have edited my grammar for that purpose here.

Brackets and the Debt Clock

[9-26-11 UPDATE: Tax Plan and "Fiscal Terrorism" A slight rearrangement and edit for clarity below. ]

[In might be easier if the links and asterisks are referenced later.***]

The whole issue of cuts over revenues * _ must be sorted out on two fronts. There is the issue of the so-called "progressive" tax code. Then there is the issue of the history of the tax code(see* pun), and how it impacts the debt clock.

The first regards the "Buffet Rule". There are the actual tax bracket rates(10% to 35%), and then there is the effective tax rate, which is further complicated(reduced) by captial gains tax rates(15%). Let us also be reminded that even the richest pay the same rates for their first brackets worth of income,(ZERO), let alone each bracket's worth of income. But since the capital gains tax is most of the income of the bulk of the rich, the effective tax rate will not be the actual sum of each bracket's worth. I will not bother to do some math here, but I hope it is clear. Basically the effective tax rate for the rich are not effective as "progressive" by a look at their brackets. They effectively get a lower tax rate, because capital gains are taxed less than the middle to top income brackets.

Second, there is the matter of the "Debt Clock", which should have its own brackets of sorts. The Bush wars, as well as his Medicare(fix), not to mention his tax cuts are off the clock so-to-speak. Not to mention the economic down turn which should probably reset the clock. If I was able to clarify the first issue, I don't mean to make up for it by complicating the second. But the "spending under borrowing" is more than a pun, it is an economic effect. For now I just mean to address the clock issue. Where I imagine that there could be some way to show previous administration's as well as the current administration's** debt clocks.

Now, I hope that I can get away with not providing more detail. But it is not so simple, as I almost closed the issue. It would not be simply an historical replay of their debt clocks, but a sorting of the debt from their budgets. So we would have several clocks at different brackets in time. This is the matter, where the devil is in the details. This almost becomes a matter for mathematical physicists in regard to the dynamics of budgets and time, in that each bracket in time has potential future impact where political economists would sit in for the mathematical physicists.

But, I hope that it can be imagined that each bracket in time, have two clocks. Their own budget and the debt that was not theirs. I will leave it for real economists or accountants to sort out whether there needs to be more than two, as I don't know if it is just my imagination, or the reality of the difficulty in sorting this out. In this regard, I mean the difficulty of sorting a budget's impact over time. But maybe it can be imagined from the effective impact that war and medicare can have on people and how dynamic that is over time, let alone the setting of tax rates. In fact, that is addressed by one or two instances alone. The Bush tax cuts were temporary. The Bush wars and the Medicare fix were not paid for.



[Please note that the links and image were inserted after completion of this blog post. They include, in order: The New York Times, FOX NEWS, No-Labels, and the Center for American Progress [9-26-11: OurFuture.org], where it was not my intent to lower the level of discourse nor bring more nuanced metaphor to light. But please note my No-Labels comment, in regard to the referees and what is on the table. Not to pun on a game buffet, but the neither the cuts sandwich nor the sand wedged in links were referenced for the writing of this post. But it may be suitable that brackets and clocks are used in games. This is a not so nuanced reference to the sports analogy of politics.]

*which alone needs some economic sorting: I mean "spending under borrowing", to pun a bit.
** oops, a whole new clock issue, why not bracket it by congresses?
*** not to mention by myself

[9-23-11 Update 'nuff s' Ed?] Iron Chef!

[9-29-11 update on timing, see comment 2. Speaking of timing,(darn) lost it for a moment.]

Para-model

I will begin at the end, or rather the present.
Less than two paragraphs in:
What's Left of the Left. Why do I begin at that moment? Allow me to begin again at this moment.
What is Left of the Left?
(the lede of the link)(4)***
Is this a geometric or quantitative heading?
What is not right about the left?
Or how much of the left is still there?

Now if I may do a Hansel and Gretel impersonation...my point is that I have worked out my path off-blog. i.e. left some pebbles to attempt to trace my path.
The reality is that I got the article from** MSNBC*, (current lede) Actually I got the link not the article. So I am still working it out, but will now save my Para-model.doc with this.

* actual clip here later
**anachronistic conundrum(or appropriate con un drum)[Cain beating the media.(1)]
*** post save doc: golf term "four"/Mulligan?

[Now I must note that I will square [bracket(#)] and or continue after reading more.]
[I should now note that I have left open a blog I was editing, which has now been inserted in my Para-model.doc ala my Hansel and Gretal MO. Apparently the pebbles were bread crumbs, but in reading What is Left of the Left, noticing that I have read only one of seven pages, I must MoveOn for the time being.]
[Now... actually just moments after the last bracket I will make a point.(see **(1) On what the heck is Cain doing? He is working the model of the media, in a fourth branch sort of way. He is getting attention, and I will sort out that fourth dimension. And I must note I am impressed with Joe the Plumber and Rupert the Survivor as candidates of a third kind. Not to call them, "Out There". But I think there is something to the polarity and needing more perspectives than our parties and branches provide. And this is reflected in a mechanics and dynamics, that is not just two dimensional. But Steven Jobs did point out to Rupert Murdoch that it can be either constructive or destructive. It is not about left or right, up or down, or forward or back again. It is about making progress or not. Everything else is how, and by and for whom? Does any of this embedded here or in my saved doc, explain: that the more radical a comment the more coverage it gets? It might depend on if one is Leaning Forward or Fair and Balanced. Now, I know that there is some perspectivism here, but Fair and Balanced does not mean two dimensional. Now it just depends on if I am talking about the Media or Faux News.]
[My apologies for my Quantum Leap over the Big Cheese, I feel my bread crumbs may be safe in draft see image.]


[Andrea Mitchell: Why has the president waited? Because he wanted congress to do their job! That was my preemptive answer to the preemptive question. Meaning, I was expecting the question and anticipated the answer, which just may be in the unfinished heading: What is Left of the Left.(No question mark or exclaimation mark?)]
[Speaking of Hands or Thumbs: L-curve anyone?]


[My para-model.doc is a bibliograpy of sorts(pun intended). Some Late Entries.: not to mention blog searches for con+scious, con+science, anarchy, tyranny, and thumb and buffet.]
[For the record Searches @thumb= Star Chamber/Big Cheese/Para-Model/Obama Doctrine/Who are they calling?. @buffet= Para-model/Big Cheese/From GOP to NOP/Brackets and Debt Clock/N-oddly Enough/All Politics is Local/Commander in Chief/Off the Cliff/Irony versus Hypocrisy. By this I am recording what the Al Gore Rythms find, just in case something changes.]
[This is bleapin' freaky considering my heading and intention here: The last of my late entries, and the last thing(or link) in my para-model.doc is this and (THIS)is the first thing Ed Schultz is talking about when I turn on his show. QED? Not to mention the rest of his show, which is yet to run(he is going on about Romney in Ohio? and a clear plan, and Democrats losing the message war, then Bernie Sanders and the NYtimes poll?), but is actually digitally delayed for local radio.]

Still going? QED?]

FOOTNOTE PAGE THREE

2-12-13 : see image and flow (4F?)

2-13-13 : Plank (b.s.) A. The History of B.S., B. Health Care Summit (sc), C.Enough? (sc), D. , E. I'm not saying..., F. , G. Co-Wink-E-Dink?, H. A Shot in the Arm?, I. In the begining..., J. A PEAS meant... (sc), K.Two Points (sc), L. Legislation not politics!, M. Walking the Plank[!] (sc)

{L}:*  review of (sc)=[Scroll Click]. The hyperlinked headings that are sorted from the (b.s.)=[blog search] are sometimes not to the post they head. Hence one can scroll and see that they are not the link under (sc). But the (sc) will contain the link of the heading.[ or as evolved 4-4-13 below*]

2-14-13 (F P too?) A.  B. (sc)   C. (sc)

2-28-13  (Breaking Bread?)
(b.s.) Irony+chef = Rocket Man?[!] , I Ron Knee Chef
(b.s.) Buffet+food= The Big Cheese (sc)

*4-4-13 (link inserted) (sc) evolved ABC's will be used to carry the link that is for some reason of the (b.s.)'s algorithms not in the heading.)

All Politics is Local?

Welcome** Home Again.

[7-10-11 The Irthlingz opened the NWRoots 2011 Conference with a great song about "everything" that's related*** to the ecology, starting with the economy. I was also privileged to be one of three to hear a song they could not fit in at the closing. I hope to bring more details and comments to this post, but will just note that I attended three Breakout Sessions; Labor, Electronic Voting, and the Media Panel*.
More Later]

* a tangent to read later

[7-11-11 N-other tangents and suggested read w/video
Hint: N=3 gents refers to Murdoch, Buffet and Maher; not with the intent to spin out from local, but there is an intersection with the Media panel and consolidation, not to mention a derivative-lined analogy.]

** 7-17-11 link update
*** correction "the economy depends on the ecology"

Read or Ship?

Not fully sewn or C-sawed[!]


Pre~emptive Rant:
The Obama Economy is not working[!]   You got Ed!


Poll proposal:
Which would you rather have more Bane or change?


Pardon the irony or mixed parody, which would you rather have, more Republican in the form of X, or Democracy in the form of Y? Still frackin’ about the Bane or poll-R-ization?  AKA~
More of whatever Boehner is selling or more of what Warren in the form of Elizabeth and Buffet suggest?
　Post-Ship or Precalculus of WOT?
Purple Badge of Rhetoric.
SUBtext or setting:  
The Decartooning of Adam Smith or the full crumb of Keynesian/teeter recovery .  

ROF, WOF

Ring of Fire

War on Freedom!

Rough Comments:

BBBB

Better Business Beyond Bull!

Or Bush!

Tale Gating !

[I may have forgotten the original excuse for the BB acronym. It was not the Buffet Bureau, and I am not sure** of (yet to find) the Ring of Fire links from this weekend(as I jotted down the above thoughts yesterday), which may have triggered the wag*on Freedom.]

* Republicans Repeal Beatitudes?

** sure: Occupy Movement

not: Mortgage Fraud Settlement (or vice verse us)

[Yes the wag is war on freedom. Woof? (on or?) War on/or freedom? Wag the Woof? Yes, Freedom is wagged as a word, but the effects are farther*** from freedom.]

*** It seems that Rick Santorum has raised nuance to a parsing of religious and economic freedom.

[NOW with Alex Wagner: Ari Melber sitting in on six months of OW.]

[Andrea Mitchell, Eva Longoria and American Progress .]

[Martin Bashir: Oil Fabrication, and Culture War.]

[Hard Ball,"Wow, it's getting too sophisticated." through 3-and-a-half men and Winning!]]

Two Wrongs Make a Right?

Romney would rather have the discussion be, him as a victim of class warf**are, than discussing the choice between his (Ryan/Bane or Priebus/Gitmo) economy and the Obama Economy.
(Trigger? Hardball!)
(Out-sourcing/Off shoring? That's the ticket or GitMo.)
(Kill*** the Strategy:  More Politics ofor* the Table.)

* [!]  not quite over(Water Sport anyone)

[7-11-12 All links added today.]
[Not sure about the Hardball. Is that the ticket?]

**A mitt-insert, structural typo, or metaphorical evolution of warf-are. 
*** Skirting the poly ticks.(Holder v. Hold-up)
[Not that out-sourcing or off-shoring are wrong, but man up ...] *iv

  

$urfin'USA...

*iv: [!]= sarcasm/typo meta/prophetic

[4mooLAY$hun: foundation+buffet=table ?]

[Big Ed: dog and pony ref ;-)]

P.S. (Pre-Selection: Romney/Ryan 2012)

The Vice President Rolls

Currently speaking before*** the NAACP, Vice President Biden drives** President Obama's record against the wall that is* the Republican party and their candidate. 

(Brakin' news on Bane or change "existentialist" opposition research Raw Money the con spiracy candid ate.  See aster risks[!])  It may be more than interesting how things Pan out [!]

*** (anachronism)"ain't your father's" mess age in? ( i.e. links to be added )
**"eviscerate" was originally one of the choices in my lede
*awkard metaphor
[Note that asterisk were placed progressively: *,**,***]
[Links inserted *** in reverse, after the link it applies to "before". The broke-in pun of existential ism is "interesting" "pa"n "out" [!] Ctrl F Spells = prophetic.]
[Ouch what a fet we weave.]

SEG WAY: GPS of sorts? 
I have updated several PAGES today. Re- sorts of sort.
The plan is to review the meta4s.  (Buffet/Table Structure/Drive)
Or restructure the "L"aments of existentialism.
Earth, Wind, Fire, Water. Con Science?

(7-13-12: links 2&3& YouTube and Speech label added)

War'n Buffet Rule

Gephardt* McConnell Battle. 

* Re: congre$$
AM: Pelosi/Klobuchar Gang **

** links/line anachronistic
AM=Andrea Mithell

FOOTNOTES PAGE TWO NOVEMBER 2013

11-6-13: "email inspiration" (b.s.)s / A. 2-16-11 Slash Segue , 6-9-10 Speaking of jobs..., 2-1-11 Yikes! 3.0 /  B. 9-26-11 The Be All and End All? , 8-31-11 INET ,  6-21-11  Hi Ate Us , 6-26-13 Post Newtonian Economics, SoDo Amalgam, C3PO, (sic), The Fighting Ill Lie Nigh!, V for Victim, Righting the Ship[?], A Rising Tide, 10-2-11* Retro-Gate, 6-29-11 Caging Godzillas , 5-18-11 Technical Difficulties
*format (sc)anachronism (b.s.)=blog searches A & B. dated links reflect scroll click anomaly
mean while ... seg wae

11-21-13 "pun": Knot to Buffet Gates under "more"/"ladder".  1. A. Give 'em a break!, B. Gatekeeper on a High Horse?, C. Remember Pearl Harbor! / 2. A. Thumbs/GOP and OWS , B. Dimentionalism(sic). [Bingo 8 uR baby.]

11-24-13 search anomaly? A. "no such thing as bad press" , B(red labeling).,  C. Update , D. Flip-Flop the Pyramid - \/   Understanding "Social Darwinism^ " may not explain blog search results or M-beds, but may be correlary to the mess age: why blog searchs locate posts with their headings hyperlinked  to a.) prior link, b.) blog searches, c.) outside links.  ^ Kaufmann/Popper/Hegel

FOOTNOTES PAGE ONE- MAY 2014

5-4-14  In Spiration: Salon-W.R. Klemm / Sch~hhh[!] ... Who started it, I finished it, it still needs sense. (Ctrl F: sense ) Everything Model? A. Para-model, B. Almost makes me want to tweet. , C. Wittgenstein, D. The Politics of the Table. , E. What the Beck? (Witt Gen Stein's Buffet)   Milo Wolfowitz (FP2)

5-5-14:  fath:   ...:   gr :  your : [nexus, cats, herstory, herding] 1.A. NEXUS REVIEW (Re-posted) , B., C., D., E., F., G., H., I.  2. A., B. C. D. Reigning wags and tales ...  M. 3. EH? The History of B.S. 4[$]. A. B., C.Congress is Like Herding Death Panels!, D. What's good for the goose... [?] ow!  

5-7-14: SkyNet published from 5-6-14. Yes link inserted, but italics added. 

5-29-14 this:  Nixon- Plausible Deniability / Bush 43- Plausible Incompetence / Snowden- Plausible What?  Hence the word.  Posting based solely on NBC link.  4Later digging/yet/to read.  ...& further D'Ribble rather than G'Ribble;  Plausible Disciplination asks about his education and training in law or civics or what else he was educated in that might inform his understanding of this exchange with authorities, not that we should expect constitutional scholars not to have varied opinions.  Italics: not a foundation for my ainfount[><].  i.e. bu'dump ump[~]

JUNE(2013) FOOTNOTE PAGE ONE

6-3-13: 9/9 [sub-leak?-WikiLeaks’ Paul Ryan exposure, (2/5) Case Study, Ryan/Romney run from Ryan plan.., Smirking Gun[!], (5 /5)Obama Leaks]  Bottom-Line? [Really!{?} Future Bubble?, Bricks and stones, Unspinning Charlotte! !]

6-5-13:  8/15 two versions, 10/15 not(a,b) 11/15 too (a - Irony versus Hypocrisy, b(ii), c, d, Regime Rhetoric Reply)

6-6-13:  Recent Ex-Changes of 7, 2 /7, Mitt's BO*Son, Try Angle, 5 of,  The Mis-Underestimator of, "people like you"/7.   
1 of 15, 2, 3 of15, 4of, 5, 6, 7, 8 of, 9 /, Contempt for Courage, Better Business Bureau, 12 of,  What the Beck? /, 14 of, 15-All in?

6-10-13 (b.s.) Under the Table?, The Maze of Mace( 2/7 ), Bring It On!, Lib...Ya[!] is not Free!( 4 ), Toning Down the Lines.( 5 ), Progress is Global( 6 ),  Phase II? 

6-21-13 Not Here Yet!

6-24-13 NOW is to be inserted later.  "first+casualty"(b. s.) / "on the table buffet" ( b. s. ) (sc)

6-25-13 Yes, mean time is one word[!] C-till or...(fn2)
6-26-13 Hecuva job and whose here to help you, re labels and spoiler alerts.
6-27-13 : Post Newtonian Economics ... hilite Knot [!]

Ctrl F "anachronistic"

blog search (b.s.) anachronistic*

(search: 4th dunn)
(b.s.) a. Anachronistic Reasoning?, b. Faux Campaign, c. FAUX NEWS!, (e.), f. Clause Wits (3.0)?, (g)host Busters, h. Roar Shack, i. A Tail of Caution, ( j. ), k. ether note, l. F'n P[!]  m. War'n Buffet Rule , n. By Polar , o. From 17A to 37B, p. Killing Fields of Dreams,  q. Future Bubble? , (r.).

*anomaly knot
(_) Rat Races Van Mices?, The LESS THAN pentagonal file:, Bury the lede?, Too Random...,

[ Picture Theory: 1. The Curve or Nuance Thing, 2. For Words!, (3.), 4. GOP Plan to Hurt Economy
Speaking of timing [!] Philosophy Now links may be free for limited time. Democracy is not.
On meaning. / War On/Or Terrorism ? , MoveOn , Decider Stays Course., FAST REVERSE or BACKTRACK BEFORE FAST TRACK , ]